Service · Testing and QA

Test automation

Automated tests earn their keep when identical checks recur release after release. With one release a year, forget it. With a release every two weeks, repeating the manual regression round becomes the slowest part of delivery.

Send an enquiry See the scope

Full suite

minutes, not days

Every build

tested automatically

Selection

what matters, not everything

Report

failing step pinpointed

What the service covers

Only stable, frequently repeated flows get automated. Aiming for 100 per cent coverage costs more than it saves.

Talk it through with us

Choosing scenarios

Revenue-critical flows that are checked most, such as sign-in, ordering and checkout, go first.

Writing tests

Playwright, Cypress or pytest suites designed to shrug off cosmetic UI tweaks; brittle selectors would eat any savings.

Test data

Seeded and torn down per run so tests stay independent, with no real personal data in the test environment.

Pipeline

Every commit triggers the suite in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or Azure DevOps, with no human needed to start it.

Reporting

Failures point to the exact step, include a screenshot and post a message to Teams or Slack.

Upkeep

As features evolve, tests are adjusted. Budget for it as a continuous activity.

How we deliver it

Expect the first automated checks within two or three weeks. The payoff is felt once the core journeys are covered.

Business case

We total the hours your team currently spends on manual regression. The payback period follows from that.

Foundation

A cloud runner, test data tooling and a reporting set-up.

Coverage

Tests are added in priority order, beginning with the flows whose failure would hurt the most.

Ongoing care

Suites are kept in step with the product and any unstable test is investigated.

An unreliable test does more harm than a missing one. Once a suite cries wolf a few times, people stop looking at red builds, and real regressions slip past unnoticed. A flaky test is repaired straight away or removed.

Common questions

Yes. Scripts are fast and never tire, but they only verify what someone wrote down. Discovering an unexpected problem in a new feature needs human curiosity. Automation takes away drudgery, not jobs.

On rarely released products, on prototypes and on interfaces that keep changing. A monthly redesign would force constant rewrites and leave the suite permanently behind.

Enough, not the maximum. Revenue-generating journeys and areas with a history of defects are normally sufficient. Coverage targets for their own sake produce busywork.

Yes. We audit what is there, delete unreliable or duplicate tests and continue in the framework your team already uses.

Related services

View the whole area

Service Functional testing Every user journey checked before release Service Load testing How your system copes when everyone arrives at once Service Usability testing Real users reveal where the interface trips them up Service Penetration testing Vulnerabilities found before anyone else finds them

Let us automate your testing

Let us know your release cadence and how many hours a manual regression round takes. We will work out the payback.

Email
office@apply.dk

Coverage
All of Denmark, delivered remotely

I agree that Apply may handle my details as set out in the privacy policy